|
|
Post by telebender on May 25, 2019 14:15:20 GMT -7
I know this has been done.everybody has an opinion so what's yours?
Edit: Assuming 24bit. If you are not recording at 24 bit. you should think about it.
I'll say that I'm at 44.1 or 88.2 depending on how many tracks at once i need. and the 88.2 is only because the latency is lower and down conversion math should be easier.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2019 15:05:39 GMT -7
The 24 bit compared to 16 is actually more important.
|
|
|
|
Post by telebender on May 25, 2019 15:24:36 GMT -7
The 24 bit compared to 16 is actually more important. yes, I'm assuming all 24 bit. Thanks |
|
|
|
Post by telebender on May 25, 2019 15:56:02 GMT -7
The 24 bit compared to 16 is actually more important. roscoe, if we send you a bunch of tracks, what format would you prefer? (quality aside) |
|
|
|
Post by GuitarZ on May 25, 2019 16:25:48 GMT -7
24 Bit - Definite Yes! I seem to have problems transferring wav files when they're not 44.1. We've tried 88 and such and always ran into an issue. So, I stick to 44.1 figuring that's where I'm going to end up anyway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2019 0:39:15 GMT -7
The 24 bit compared to 16 is actually more important. roscoe, if we send you a bunch of tracks, what format would you prefer? (quality aside) We work at 96k pretty much exclusively. I can work with any sample rate but things like vocals, cymbals and acoustics sound better at higher rates so I prefer higher rates. |
|
|
|
Post by telebender on May 27, 2019 15:13:36 GMT -7
When I use higher than 48 my ADAT expansion is reduced. other than that, I could record at any sample rate but for guitar, I honestly can't hear a difference. What I don't know is that if I send a 44.1 file to someone, would they have more options if i used a higher rate? something that i can't even hear? when they bring the file into their rig does it even matter? I realize that converters come into play at some point but man, this is a simple thing to change. so should i just use 192 to cover bases? (I'm not expecting an answer to these questions)
|
|
|
|
Post by telebender on May 29, 2019 17:04:06 GMT -7
Okay. my interface can do 24bit/192khz. I'm gonna go DAW at 32bit float, 96khz, and 64bit processing. convert/export as needed. why not  |
|
|
|
Post by telebender on Jun 26, 2019 9:26:18 GMT -7
This all worked great until i get about 30 tracks full of Slate's Tape Machine and MixRack. These plugins seem to be super hogs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2019 15:11:18 GMT -7
This all worked great until i get about 30 tracks full of Slate's Tape Machine and MixRack. These plugins seem to be super hogs. If you like that plug put on your mix rather than the individual tracks. |
|
