matte
New Member
Posts: 45
|
Post by matte on Mar 10, 2021 18:39:14 GMT -7
First of all, your demo is also the reason I bought one. So you’re already doing killer work. That and the fact it’s just a killer amp that sounds like I always wanted to sound.
That said, some of my preferred reviews are ones where they play some part into a looper. And then just show you what it sounds like moving the controls around. And I think that would be especially useful for this amp. That way people can really understand the full range of possibilities it has. And I think the sweet water demo may do this. But even in theirs it doesn’t quite show the full range IMO.
But again your method isn’t broken by any means.
|
|
|
Post by adam on Mar 11, 2021 18:28:36 GMT -7
First of all, your demo is also the reason I bought one. So you’re already doing killer work. That and the fact it’s just a killer amp that sounds like I always wanted to sound. That said, some of my preferred reviews are ones where they play some part into a looper. And then just show you what it sounds like moving the controls around. And I think that would be especially useful for this amp. That way people can really understand the full range of possibilities it has. And I think the sweet water demo may do this. But even in theirs it doesn’t quite show the full range IMO. But again your method isn’t broken by any means. Matte, thanks a ton. I tried to hit a number of bases so that people could get a decent idea of what the amp might do while being cognizant that it was created to kind of fill some higher gain, maybe perceived "hole" in the lineup. I like the looper idea too, and certainly would be easy enough to do. I kind of feel like Pete Thorn just owns this stuff, and I really think that was his original idea too. When I watch other reviews doing that, I feel like Pete should get copyright money or something. Stuff like that is why I try to do something different. One thing "broken" in my process is that anytime you add anyone to the equation, it like doubles the production time. The kings x caz thing which I did for fun probably took 100-150 hours to produce. You'd never guess that until you tried something like that. And no big deal because I wanted to do it, but when I look at the stats on that one, like it really has no views, it's getting about 30 impressions from YouTube a day, and only about 20% of the total views came from YouTube and all the rest is from someone sharing it on Facebook or me sharing it here, well, it makes me wonder partly what's the point, and partly there must be a better way. That's really why I asked. Regarding the YT thing on the kings x one, it pushed like normal for me and then after day 3, they just stopped pushing it all. That makes me wonder too. I feel like my account is capped at a certain level, like if I don't do anything, there are some vids that do say 30 views a day. If I release a new video, those go to 0, then after a couple days they start getting promoted again and go back to normal. Another odd one on the last vid is the click through rate is as high as anything I've done, but if they don't present it, there's no views. I'm sure me and another 1000 peeps are trying to make heads or tails of that stuff too. Anyway, next vid will have the boss in it and he has character and charm and intelligence so that alone will make it way more compelling. Thanks for your feedback. Mental note created!
|
|
|
Post by eeyore on May 8, 2021 20:55:30 GMT -7
One should be shipped to Ola Englund. He'll give it the "Will It Chug?" treatment and put it on display for nearly every metal head on the planet. Either him or Fluff (Riffs Beards and Gear) 🤘😎🤘
|
|